Big Ups to FSU and OSU

I just have to say “thank you” to THE Florida State University and THE Ohio State University for proving my point — debating the number one seeds before all games are played is ridiculous.  If only Tulsa (who must’ve still been celebrating their victory over UAB) and Syracuse had stepped their game up…

LINK (or read below): Making Sense Out of Number One Seeds

On that note, I think this gives Pittsburgh Michigan State’s number one seed.  I still think UNC will get a number one seed (likely fourth overall) with maybe Memphis getting the top overall (?).  Doubtful…the committee will likely give Louisville the top overall, but it is not as though that really matters.  I also think that Missouri will likely be a two-seed, perhaps ahead of Oklahoma (even though the Tigers had a relatively easy run to the Big 12 title).  As for UNC, I mean, the committee has GOT to have an ACC team in there.  Over the past 20 years, there have been only four occasions where an ACC team was NOT a number one seed (2003, 1996, 1990, 1989), and it is usually either UNC or Duke.  Well, I guess Duke could get it…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s